ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review

2010-09-03 14:36:49
  On 9/3/10 12:06 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On 03/Sep/10 16:15, Hector Santos wrote:
[Importance of From] said, I believe what you speaking of is when a mail bot
completely take over a message from an authorized or intentional
design basis. i.e. a newsletter, a newspaper article, a read only
forum, whatever, etc, messaging usages were the From: is less
important and more of a "global entity."
Yes, I'm speaking of cases where the From is being rewritten already.
   Frankly, I don't like that the value of "From" be changed.  However,
in the regrettable case it is changed, it doesn't hurt if it is
rewritten in a standardized way.

And how about joint signatures?
Why not use TPA-Labels instead to authorize the third-party signature?
Let me ask you this, does this apply to a MLM serving a LIST such as
this one? IETF-DKIM? Should it be programmed to change it to?
Please refer to Charles' original proposal for details
http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2010q3/013807.html
Such concepts seem to run headlong into IDNA efforts, especially when a 
conversion can not be accommodated.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eai-frmwrk-4952bis-07

-Doug

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>