-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 12:23 PM
To: J.D. Falk
Cc: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review
How about: "It is important to us that this arrive at your inbox
signed by us and unmodified. You should not keep it if that is not the
case."
Well OK. Now I'm hearing that it's the signature that's important, not
the message. No disagreement there.
Since the signature's success is predicated on [some part of] the body being
immutable in transit, are those distinct?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html