ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review

2010-09-14 11:17:32
MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:

John R. Levine

I remain unable to reconcile "this is very important" and "throw 
it away" applied to the same message.

You are unable to reconcile those two because you are leaving out the
third part of the equation. That is:

"there is a high risk of abuse for this domain when a message is not
authenticated".

+1, which is important because for many systems, authenticated 
sessions skips many or all email security checks.  For our SMTP 
system, once authenticated, all SMTP level checks are skipped. It is 
the unsolicited unauthenticated sessions where security checks best 
applies.

-- 
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>