ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)

2011-04-06 06:49:28
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:24:29 +0100, Murray S. Kucherawy  
<msk(_at_)cloudmark(_dot_)com> wrote:

Not quite. For example if an st= tag is in the header and the signature  
verifies, then you know that tag was put there (or at least was present)  
when the signature was made, and was not inserted by some  
scammer-in-the-middle.

That is an essential feature upon which future versions/whatever can then  
rely.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131                       
   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>