ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)

2011-04-03 16:14:50
OK.  So the capability exists, but people choose not to use it.  Some people in 
fact choose to disable this capability; note that a) ADSP is an add-on, not the 
DKIM core, and b) the actual uptake of ADSP on the receive side is not known to 
be large.

So the suggestion is to add a second capability that performs the same function 
as the first, on the theory that, this time, folks will use it for that purpose?

The logic sequence has some problems, but I don't believe it's reflection of 
the 
current situation is one of them.

d/


On 4/3/2011 10:02 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
Why doesn't the d= value satisfy this function just as well?

Remember that d= can have sub-domains, to distinguish different
streams.


I'll answer: Paypal and ADSP

Yes it can be done, are people doing it: no

people are using their domain name for their corporate email and application, 
they are not ready to do corp.mydomain.com

http://postmaster.facebook.com/outbound

Facebook is mixing up their corporate email with their users email...


-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>