ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)

2011-04-07 07:16:11
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:29:49 +0100, Steve Atkins 
<steve(_at_)wordtothewise(_dot_)com>  
wrote:

As a concrete example, if I wanted to include the authenticated
age of each email sender (something the gambling industry might
be interested in) then I can do that within the DKIM signature:

DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=corp.example.com; <blah>; db=19700224


Actually, what you want is a gerenal purpose txt or comment header, in  
which the signer can place any remark that he considers worthy of his  
signature (including the capacity in which he is adding his signature -  
another feature that people argue about).

E.g. DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=corp.example.com; <blah>;
                      tx="birthdate=1970-02-24"

or   DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=corp.example.com; <blah>;
                      tx="signed by List Expander"

I suppose such a tag would have to be an extension to avoid recycling at  
Proposed.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131                       
   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>