On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:45:22 +0100, Douglas Otis
<dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org>
wrote:
Review the charter exclusions. There can be no deeper meaning defined
for the i= field.
But undoubtedly individuals are going to use the field in ways that they
find useful to their purpose (with knowledge of their own situations). All
I am trying to say is that the 'i=' tag is not so totally broken that it
is useless for any pourpose whatever. Hence it should be kept, since it is
already there and will get used.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html