-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:42 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary
4.9. Output Requirements
The output of the verifier MUST embody:
Correction: "For each signature on the message that was not ignored by the
verifier, the output..."
I note that there is similar text in the current Section 3.9 -- which will
become 3.10 -- concerning SDID/AUID:
Hence, DKIM's mandatory output to a receive-side Identity Assessor is
a single domain name. Within the scope of its use as DKIM output,
the name has only basic domain name semantics; any possible owner-
specific semantics are outside the scope of DKIM. That is, within
its role as a DKIM identifier, additional semantics cannot be assumed
by an Identity Assessor.
I suggest deleting the first sentence and moving the remainder tot he
new 3.9.
WFM.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html