Just a short note. Excuse me for not responding, I've been away from my
office for a couple of hours due to the fact that we have today Memorial
Day, at which we remember the WW-II victims. I'm catching up reading all
contributions...
/rolf
On 5/4/11 10:57 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Hector Santos [mailto:hsantos(_at_)isdg(_dot_)net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 1:49 PM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: Michael Thomas; ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary - proposing ODID "Originating Domain
Identity"
But its not clear on the other outputs appropriate for the receiver to
consider.
And who gets to define "appropriate"?
It's already been pointed out that we could list every current tag's value
and a pile of other stuff to pass on to the next layer, which may or may not
find it useful, but that would make for an extremely messy protocol.
Protocols need to be kept simple.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html