On 05/09/2011 02:28 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
Semantics first: we don't "vote" here.
OK, that taken care of, it's a fair request, because there's been a
lot of discussion about it. We certainly have a good base of support
for deprecating "l=".
So I'll ask it this way, starting a new thread for it:
I determine from discussion that there's enough support for
deprecating "l=" to qualify as rough consensus *if* there's not much
objection to it. It's the objection we need to gauge. Please post to
this thread if you object to deprecating "l=" in 4871bis. You may say
why you object, but please keep it brief, and let's not have a lot of
discussion of it here. If there's enough objection to derail
deprecation, we will leave it alone.
I object. I've already asked whether there's been one
documented case of ill effect in 5+ years. Crickets.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html