On Tue, 10 May 2011 00:02:36 +0100, Barry Leiba
<barryleiba(_at_)computer(_dot_)org>
wrote:
That was quick. I believe we already have enough objections to say
that we do NOT have rough consensus for deprecating l= at this time.
I'll close the issue in the tracker (issue #26), and we will leave it
as it is.
Of course, folks may, if it makes them feel good, continue to register
objections here.
Yes, leave it be. Point out some problems if you wish, but no more. People
seem to be using it.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html