Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Consider deprecating "l="

I think it was a mistake to include l= in the first place, but I
find Murray's arguments against taking it out now persuasive.

I would also really like to have a better idea of how people are
using it, notably, for all those messages where l= doesn't cover
the whole body, what's in the naked part.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html