John R. Levine wrote:
This is a valid point. Sean, please consider that the working group
did not discuss the possibility of changing the status from BCP to
Proposed Standard. You might remove that from the writeup.
I suspect you would find signficant objection to making it a PS.
Considering how little of the advice is based on actual practice, even BCP
is a stretch.
G-d! and I was deathly afraid to comment on the same thing! So I'm
happy you said it!
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html