On 5/11/2011 10:17 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I suspect you would find signficant objection to making it a PS.
Probably not if it's made into an Applicability Statement:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026#section-3.2
That's simultaneously a reasonable and a terrible idea.
The construct is currently unused and is also currently under discussion.
IMO, we should stay away from nascent experiments about fuzzy topics with a
poor
track-record.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html