Hi Alessandro,
At 03:22 16-05-2011, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
However, relaxed header canonicalization is not MIME compatible. In
particular, RFC 2045 says
I don't think that it was ever meant to be MIME compatible.
Many MTAs still add a Domainkey-Signature. They could stop that, and
add a legacy DKIM-Signature along with a one that features the newer
canonicalization instead. Setting the pace in this manner can keep
DKIM development alive indefinitely.
The MTAs that are still adding a Domainkey-Signature will keep doing
that irrespective of what goes on in this working group. I prefer
not to keep DKIM development alive indefinitely if the sole purpose
is not to produce results.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html