-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of SM
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 9:27 AM
To: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] discardable, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-
mailinglists-10.txt> (DKIM And Mailing Lists) to BCP
At 05:22 16-05-2011, John R. Levine wrote:
I realize there are people who wish it meant something else,
typically
simultaneously saying "this mail is very important" and "throw this
mail
away", which is absurd, or perhaps "if there's no signature, handle
it
Yes.
The definition in the RFC was hammered out after a great deal of
debate,
and I see no evidence that the definition is defective. ADSP has
plenty
of problems, but the definition of discardable isn't one of them.
I don't see any value in reopening a discussion about the definition.
Regards,
-sm
+1
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html