At 05:22 16-05-2011, John R. Levine wrote:
I realize there are people who wish it meant something else, typically
simultaneously saying "this mail is very important" and "throw this mail
away", which is absurd, or perhaps "if there's no signature, handle it
Yes.
The definition in the RFC was hammered out after a great deal of debate,
and I see no evidence that the definition is defective. ADSP has plenty
of problems, but the definition of discardable isn't one of them.
I don't see any value in reopening a discussion about the definition.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html