-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Hector Santos
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 1:30 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] New canonicalizations
The collection you have is an aggregate of many sites. However, in
reality each site will have a different PCN.
Naturally. And we can select for the data for a specific site if that's
useful. But in terms of input for developing a standard, even you must agree
that an aggregate view is at least as important as a local one.
But since you asked, selecting only for my own server, there are 11 domains in
the top relaxed/relaxed senders list before we hit the first obvious spammer.
Those are responsible for 7301 relaxed/relaxed messages out of the 16581 total
that server has seen, or 44%. And there are lots of obviously legitimate
senders below that, but I wanted to keep this report simple. Even so, it still
doesn't concur with the apparent extremeness of your data, nor do I understand
why this is an interesting statistic.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html