On 27/Jun/11 23:38, Michael Deutschmann wrote:
* Put it in its own RFC *
I think there's room for a "Minimum Quality of Forgery Supression" BCP.
Such an RFC would outline a number of faults a message can have, and
declare that any of those faults mean the message MUST NOT be delivered
to the nominal recipient.
+1, revising RFC 2505, whose date is in last century, should be due.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html