On 24 Jun 2011, at 05:55, John R. Levine wrote:
Assuming this is some other protocol layers problem; to ensure consistency
between any possible display and DKIM validation, ...
... is, for about the hundredth time, not DKIM's job.
Please chant "we have no idea how MUAs will display mail" over and over
until you believe it. This includes valid 5322 mail.
So, heck, what's the point in validating anything? After all, the MUA may
simply display this message as a link to a canadian pharm site!
I think we can be pretty sure that - if there's only one "From:" header - then
the MUA won't display an unsigned From: header in preference to a signed one.
--
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html