ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (4926)

2017-02-13 20:26:20
On 2/13/2017 5:32 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
Verified as Editorial is my preference.  Editorial because I don't
...
If you decide to leave it as Technical, then we should definitely go


Since I raised some fuss about this choice, let me be clear that I meant the fuss only in academic terms. I don't think the difference matters, in this case, in terms of IETF process or actions.

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html