On 2/8/18 12:32 PM, Mark Delany wrote:
I dunno, it's not like there isn't precedent for this. oh say, like ipv4
I think this is the biggest flaw with the whole v= rationale. There is never
going to be a v=2 change that doesn't leave everyone continuing to
generate/validate a v=1 header. Is a new header by stealth better engineering
than formalizing a new header?
Besides if you wanted to go from DKIM to EKIM, you'd be opening
pandora's box imo.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to