[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] versions, Where is the formal definition of DKIM-Signature?

2018-02-08 18:44:11

On 2/8/18 12:32 PM, Mark Delany wrote:
I think this is the biggest flaw with the whole v= rationale. There is never
going to be a v=2 change that doesn't leave everyone continuing to
generate/validate a v=1 header. Is a new header by stealth better engineering
than formalizing a new header?

I dunno, it's not like there isn't precedent for this. oh say, like ipv4 vs. ipv6?

Besides if you wanted to go from DKIM to EKIM, you'd be opening pandora's box imo.

NOTE WELL: This list operates according to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>