Re: [ietf-dkim] versions, Where is the formal definition of DKIM-Signatu

On 2/8/2018 9:45 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
> Huh?  v=1 code doesn't know what the new features would be.

Re-read what I wrote.

The code that knows to dispatch to v=2 can, just as easily, parse for 
the strings associated with the new features.
d/

--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html