In that light, I think we need requirements that are a balance between stating what sort of outcome we want but not getting so specific that they delve into the nitty-gritty that a WG should resolve.
Yes indeed. Having taken another look at Dave C's proposed charter, I think he's done that pretty well. Regards, John Levine, johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY http://www.taugh.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why we don't require requirements, Dave Crocker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why we don't require requirements, domainkeys-feedbackbase01 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why we don't require requirements, domainkeys-feedbackbase01 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |