Dkim needs to state clearly what it IS intended for. If this does not include
end-user use then dkim does not have an obligation to "prove" it. That would
be trying to olepce the negative.
D/
-----Original Message-----
From: Earl Hood <earl(_at_)earlhood(_dot_)com>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 17:45:19
To:dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net
Cc:ietf-mailsig(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: MASS/DKIM BOF Summary
On August 5, 2005 at 20:30, "Dave Crocker" wrote:
And if dkim is NOT intended for user-level?
You will need to provide more information on how DKIM is not, and why.
The way DKIM is defined, I'm not sure you can effectively prevent
people using DKIM at a user level (and the draft even indications such
usage as possible). Therefore, to to state that DKIM is not intended
for user-level may be meaningless, and to ignore the implications of
user-level-based usage would be a mistake.
--ewh
/d
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
dcrocker a t
www.bbiw.net
+1.408.246.8253