On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 10:20:56PM -0700,
ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:
[Kjetil]
+ The require clauses themselves are not affected by this extension.
I agree with this proposed solution to the problem.
Now that the door has been opened to "strings that don't
have variables expanded in them", can we consider using
the same kind of strings as variable names in "set"
commands and as match patterns?
(So they can be precompiled and don't change contents
during program execution.)
Jutta