I agree, I can't really think of a use case for the count, so I probably
shouldn't have included it in the first place.
I'd rather have both, though, and providing them is really a minor thing,
no matter how late it is.
anyone else have an opinion?
My expectation would be that ${0} is the match. I've never had a need for the
number of parts that matched. It was something I read in the draft though "oh
that's different to what I expect" but then I didn't have a big problem with it
so didn't mention it. Indeed as already mentioned, adding another set of () is
all you need if ${0} has a different meaning.
Nigel