Re: spamtestbis - percent range

> Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> > However, I believe the proposed ":tested" parameter is not needed, as
> > the original spamtest test already returns a 'not tested' result for the
> > numeric value "0". Thus a script can combine the non-percent test for
> > "0", with a percent test:
> This should cover the case. How about adding a reminder note to this
> effect to the document?
Agreed. I have no problem with this test being somewhat obscure as long as the
specification talks about how to do it.

                                Ned