Hi ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com,
--On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 07:03:46 AM -0800 ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com
wrote:
> However, I believe the proposed ":tested" parameter is not needed, as
> the original spamtest test already returns a 'not tested' result for
> the numeric value "0". Thus a script can combine the non-percent test
> for "0", with a percent test:
This should cover the case. How about adding a reminder note to this
effect to the document?
Agreed. I have no problem with this test being somewhat obscure as long
as the
specification talks about how to do it.
I tend to agree with this. Unless there are any strong arguments to the
contrary I will go ahead and make this change. I will ensure that the issue
of how best to handle 'untested' is clearly stated and will include
examples.
--
Cyrus Daboo