Re: reject incompatibility

Nigel Swinson writes:
> So we have gone from a SHOULD to a MUST, we'll I'm obvously not going 
> to vote for that... I want to give my users the choice as I don't see 
> a compelling argument that fileinto-reject should be militantly 
> prohibited.
I'll second that.

I can see many reasons avoid using fileinto-reject (or its friends). No 
compelling arguments to prohibit it.
Arnt