Re: Invalid syntax to cause runtime error in encoded-character

> On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> ...
> > note that with this ordering, the encoded-character extension can be
> > byte-compiled away entirely, a very nice property for a language which
> > is meant to be lightweight and simple.
> Exactly.
Indeed. That's certainly how I intend to implement it.

                                Ned