[Top] [All Lists]

Re: a conflict between 3598(bis) and the base specification

2007-09-26 04:06:26

Alexey Melnikov writes:
Ken Murchison wrote:
Proposed text 2:

If the address is not encoded to contain a detail sub-part, then the address fails to match any of the specified keys.

Either one is fine, I slightly prefer choice 1 (on the other hand 2 is more readable. So I guess I can't really decide in this case :-)).

Either is fine with me as well. 2 slightly better.