Re: a conflict between 3598(bis) and the base specification2007-09-26 04:06:26Alexey Melnikov writes: Ken Murchison wrote:Proposed text 2:If the address is not encoded to contain a detail sub-part, then the address fails to match any of the specified keys.Either one is fine, I slightly prefer choice 1 (on the other hand 2 is more readable. So I guess I can't really decide in this case :-)). Either is fine with me as well. 2 slightly better. Arnt
|
|