[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Naming conventions for Sieve RFCs

2007-12-12 12:31:24

On Wed, Dec 12, 2007, Alexey Melnikov 
<alexey(_dot_)melnikov(_at_)isode(_dot_)com> said:

Ken Murchison wrote:

Alexey Melnikov wrote:

Philip Guenther wrote:

On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Philip Guenther wrote:

For the drafts that's already in the RFC editor queue, I suspect 
this is best done by settling on the format, then Alexey swinging 
by the RFC editor table and asking them how they would like to get 
the request.

Alexey and I chatted with the RFC editor and they said "yes, please 
put all title updates in a single request and have your AD bless it".

Have we settled on the format?
I just received a message from RFC editors saying that documents will 
go to AUTH48 shortly...

Indeed.  If/when we decide on a format, am I supposed to send in the 
title change(s) myself, or will the chairs do so?  I'm putting 
together some other changes as we speak.

As nobody seems to be able to make a decision on this, chairs decided 
that all RFCs should use the following title:

Sieve Email Filtering: <Foo> Extension

I will send RFC editor messages for each affected RFC-to-be.

Ok, so long as we've got all our ducks in a row :-)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>