[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Proposed charter change

2008-03-13 10:07:46

Speaking as an implementor:

Cyrus Daboo wrote:

(1) Finish work on existing in-progress Working Group documents:

    (a) Body (draft-ietf-sieve-body-07.txt)

Will implement.

    (b) Notify mailto (draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto.txt)

Undecided, but will consider implementing

    (c) Edit header (draft-ietf-sieve-editheader-10.txt)

Will implement

    (d) Mime loops (draft-ietf-sieve-mime-loop-04.txt)

Will implement

    (e) Refuse/reject (draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-06.txt)

Older version already implemented.

(2) Finalize and publish the following SIEVE extensions as proposed standards:

    (a) Date/Index (draft-freed-sieve-date-index-08.txt)

Will implement

    (b) iHave (draft-freed-sieve-ihave-01.txt)

This looks very interesting, but I haven't even started thinking about how difficult this would be to implement.

    (c) Environment (draft-freed-sieve-environment-03.txt)

Will implement

    (d) Notary (draft-freed-sieve-notary-01.txt)

Will implement

    (e) SIEVE in XML (draft-freed-sieve-in-xml-01.txt)

This looks interesting, even though there is no immediate plan to implement.

    (f) Notify-sip (draft-melnikov-sieve-notify-sip-message-01.txt)

I haven't thought about implementing this yet.

    (g) ManageSIEVE (draft-martin-managesieve-08.txt)


    (h) RegEx (draft-ietf-sieve-regex-00.txt)

I am not sure this will be implemented, no customer requirements so far.

    (j) Meta-data (draft-melnikov-sieve-imapext-metadata-03.txt)

Will implement.

    (k) Include/multi-script (draft-daboo-sieve-include-05.txt)

I've started implementing something like multiscript and will be looking at include.
So this looks interesting to me.

    (k) Address data (draft-melnikov-sieve-external-lists-01)

Will implement.

(4) Produce one or more informational RFCs containing a set of test scripts and test email messages that are to be filtered by the scripts, and the expected results of that filtering. This will serve as the basis of a interoperability test suite to help determine the suitability of moving the base specification and selected extensions to Draft status.

I will definitely participate in this effort, but I can't commit to be an editor.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>