Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status

ietf-mta-filters

Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status

2011-06-23 04:33:23

Op 22-6-2011 19:54, Ned Freed schreef:


The base Sieve language may not have these constructs (and IMO should
not), but
that doesn't mean they haven't been defined. See RFC 5784.

Damn, now why did I miss this part? Yes, RFC 5784 pretty much coversmost of the issue. Apparently, it has been a while since I last read this.


Sorry for the noise.

Regards,

Stephan.

_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[sieve] SIEVE WG Status, Cyrus Daboo Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, Barry Leiba Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, Barry Leiba Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, Likepeng Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, Pete Resnick Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, Stephan Bosch Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, NED+mta-filters Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, Stephan Bosch <= Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, Alexey Melnikov Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, Pete Resnick Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, Barry Leiba [sieve] Update, was Re: SIEVE WG Status, Cyrus Daboo

Previous by Date:	Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, Barry Leiba
Next by Date:	[sieve] Update, was Re: SIEVE WG Status, Cyrus Daboo
Previous by Thread:	Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, NED+mta-filters
Next by Thread:	Re: [sieve] SIEVE WG Status, Alexey Melnikov
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]