ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Working toward unity on XML

2004-06-16 10:58:42

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 15 June 2004 10:14 pm, Greg Connor wrote:

What I would really prefer to see is a few paragraphs that say:
  1. What position you support
  2. What other fallback or compromise positions you can live with, and
  3. How strongly you feel about one or the other.


1. Position 2: Plain SPF

2. I can't live with any other option. 

3. I feel very strongly about (1). I believe that if (1) isn't adopted, we 
will lose all credibility. There is the very real risk of SPF being adopted 
regardless of the IETF. SPF has already shown momentum. No other proposal 
has.

- -- 
Jonathan M. Gardner
Mass Mail Systems Developer, Amazon.com
jonagard(_at_)amazon(_dot_)com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA0IiDBFeYcclU5Q0RAuhPAKCASNryOxrhPDMTszMYEH5IMJ/evACgy94x
D6Lh2R/ILJ9MDX+ynxveGiU=
=w+mm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>