Re: Why not XML

ietf-mxcomp

Re: Why not XML

2004-06-23 06:58:01



On 6/23/2004 8:37 AM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

This is a standards body, building standards on standards is usually
considered to be the right approach to take.


...where it makes sense.

Trying to tunnel HTTP/XML data-models over DNS doesn't make anymore sense
than trying to flop it into ARP or ICMP or any other query/response
datagram protocol.

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Why not XML, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: Why not XML, Eric A. Hall <= Re: Why not XML, Alan DeKok Re: Why not XML, Eric A. Hall Re: Why not XML, Alan DeKok Re: out of line XML, was Why not XML, John Levine Re: out of line XML, was Why not XML, william(at)elan.net Re: out of line XML, was Why not XML, John R Levine Re: Why not XML, Hadmut Danisch Re: Why not XML, Alan DeKok Re: Why not XML, Hadmut Danisch RE: Why not XML, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Previous by Date:	XML/SPF colaberation, Sauer, Damon
Next by Date:	Re: Drive Towards Consensus, Hector Santos
Previous by Thread:	RE: Why not XML, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Next by Thread:	Re: Why not XML, Alan DeKok
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]