Re: consensus statement on record syntax and type

ietf-mxcomp

Re: consensus statement on record syntax and type

2004-06-25 14:09:48


Adjusting for IETF 60 cut-off dates:

- Due 2004-07-02: Decide if CSV is complimentary, parts to beincorporated, or dropped.- Due 2004-07-08: Decide how MARID output will work with alreadydeployed SPF records (v=spf2?).

  - Due 2004-07-18: Refine SPF syntax and extensibility semantics.
  - Due 2004-07-18: Fold in PRD and SUBMITTER.

-andy

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
consensus statement on record syntax and type, Andrew Newton Re: consensus statement on record syntax and type, John Leslie Re: consensus statement on record syntax and type, Marshall Rose Re: consensus statement on record syntax and type, Andrew Newton <= Request for clarification (was: consensus statement on record syntax and type), Roy Badami Re: Request for clarification (was: consensus statement on record syntax and type), Andrew Newton Re: consensus statement on record syntax and type, Dave Crocker Re: consensus statement on record syntax and type, Andrew Newton Re: consensus statement on record syntax and type, Hector Santos

Previous by Date:	Re: CSV details, John Leslie
Next by Date:	Re: Emotions, Encoding, and Ignorance (Was: Why not XML), Sean Comeau
Previous by Thread:	Re: consensus statement on record syntax and type, Marshall Rose
Next by Thread:	Request for clarification (was: consensus statement on record syntax and type), Roy Badami
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]