If I'm understanding you, there is no new precedent.
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.html shows many preexisting IPR claims on a
variety of IETF drafts and RFCs.
eric
--On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 09:36:06 +0200 Roy Arends <roy(_at_)dnss(_dot_)ec>
wrote:
|
| On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Harry Katz wrote:
|
| > The following IPR disclosure statement was sent to
| > statements(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org earlier today.
|
| What I'm concerned about is that licensing of technology developed
| and published through the IETF sets a precedent. We'll be drifting
| from the mudpool to the quicksand.
|
| Roy Arends
|
|