Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It


Ryan Ordway <ryan(_at_)nwgeeks(_dot_)com> writes:

      Perhaps a show of hands is in order to see just
how much of a "minority" those who disapprove of the terms
of the RFSIPL are? Consider my hand raised.


My hand is raised.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Gordon Fecyk Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Paul Iadonisi Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Mark C. Langston Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Stephane Bortzmeyer Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, wayne Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Ryan Ordway Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Chuck Mead Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Chip Mefford Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, George Mitchell Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Graham Murray <= Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements - licese terms are a blow to IETF process, william(at)elan.net Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements - licese terms are a blow to IETF process, Mattias Webjörn Eriksson Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Koen Martens Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Mark C. Langston Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Ted Hardie Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Mark C. Langston Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Chuck Mead Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Daniel Quinlan RE: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, terry Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It, Koen Martens