Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe)


On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Jim Fenton wrote:

Of course, a new record type would be preferable, but there are
real-world deployment issues there.


It is a good point of encouragement.

-Rand

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), (continued) Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), David Blacka Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), william(at)elan.net Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), Frank Ellermann Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), Mark Lentczner RE: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), John Glube RE: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), Rand Wacker Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), Mark Lentczner Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), william(at)elan.net Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), Jim Fenton Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), David Blacka Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), Rand Wacker <= Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), Meng Weng Wong Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), william(at)elan.net Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), Rand Wacker RE: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), Jim Lyon RE: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), william(at)elan.net RE: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe), Rand Wacker