[wayne]
This seems pretty clear, if you want to rebrand
or redistribute the source code, you need to
contact MS and get a license. Sourceforge is
*not* the implementor, Sendmail is. Souceforge
is just redistributing the source code.
I personally don't think Sourceforge is a distributor in this case. They
are merely a courier, like FedEx. If I FedEx a CD containing a SenderID
implementation to my buddy across town, does FedEx have to sign the MS
license? Obviously not.
IANAL, of course, so I ask the lawyers out there: is there a strict
legal definition of a "(re)distributor" of software?
-ryan-