On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 06:37, Andrew Newton wrote:
The ABNF in -protocol 3.4.1 is (mostly from a post by Wayne)
version = "spf2." ver-minor "/" ver-scope *( "," ver-scope )
ver-minor = 1*DIGIT
ver-scope = "pra" / "mailfrom" / name
name = alpha *( alpha / digit / "-" / "_" / "." )
And the following stipulations:
1) "mailfrom" checking will be defined in a new draft
2) multiple records are allowed
3) a scope (e.g. "pra") can only appear in one record of one type for
validity purposes
The question before the working group: assuming no technical errors
with the above, is there anybody who vehemently objects with this
proposal?
I fully support the extraction of the patent encumbered
PRA. I do have concerns about forwarding and compatibility with
existing records, so I will reserve my judgement until the new
drafts have been published.
Ryan
--
HELO, my name is root... you have SIGKILLed my father... prepare to vi!