-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
wayne wrote:
| If there was a patent holder who covered some part of the SenderID
| proposal and their patent license required using the GPL, I would be
| just as bothered.
|
| The issue isn't what individual implementers choose to license their
| code under, the issue is whether we should advance a standard that is
| incompatible with a very large percentage of current the email
| infrastructure. The patent license on the standard covers everyone.
This is exactly why I asked Dan Quinlan about the ASF position on this.
- --
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com, head geek
http://moongroup.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBP9Xsv6Gjsf2pQ0oRAjs/AKCqAYDkOsrWCnYcxImQAaAmWLU+NACeJNn/
0PqQueHHlm4CkXLfo80wvjs=
=l8XN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----