On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, David Woodhouse wrote:
I don't think an ad hominem attack is really an appropriate response to
a concise and technical report such as the one to which you were
responding.
I shouldn't worry about Phillip's silliness. After all he is an Oxonian
and so should be familiar with institutions that are more concerned with
the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin than, say,
nuclear physics.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
SOUTH UTSIRE: SOUTHWEST BACKING SOUTHEAST 3 OR 4, INCREASING 5. FAIR. GOOD.