Re: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge


Tony Finch writes:

What we need is a method of identifying forgeries, not a method ofidentifying legitimate email.

I share that desire. However, as a practical matter it may be easier toget legitimate senders to cooperate than would-be forgers.


Arnt

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, Tony Finch RE: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, David Woodhouse RE: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, Tony Finch RE: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, Tony Finch RE: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, AccuSpam RE: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, David Woodhouse Re: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, Mark Re: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, Arnt Gulbrandsen <= Re: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, AccuSpam RE: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, Sauer, Damon RE: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, David Woodhouse Re: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, Alan DeKok Re: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, Tony Finch RE: DEPLOY: not at the University of Cambridge, Sauer, Damon