Rik van Riel said:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Chuck Mead wrote:
Again I say... this is situationally dependent. Using "MUST NOT" in the
spec is sending the wrong message. The right message is that the domain
admin "MAY USE" -all if they chose based on their individual domain
situation.
Would a SHOULD NOT be acceptable, with an appropriate note
explaining the pitfalls and why people need to be extremely
careful with the use of -all ?
I see no reason why not. That sounds reasonable. In fact it's *MUCH* more
reasonable a statement than "MUST NOT" when the "MUST NOT" is so dependent
on a domain's individual technical situation.
--
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com
Chief Tech and Bottle Washer