Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho(_at_)ifi(_dot_)uio(_dot_)no> wrote:
in fact, they will be fully authorised to spew junk and destroy your
reputation. so you take your business elsewhere -- but it won't
help. the reputation is tied to your domain name.
So your reputation doesn't recover when you move the domain
elsewhere?
Wow, you hold grudges for a *long* time.
contrast this with CSV.
Which does something else entirely, so comparisons aren't really
appropriate.
it also means that if you happen to be hosted by an irresponisible
company, you can take your business elsewhere, to a host which may
already have good reputation. the bad reputation is left behind
with the bad server.
And no one, of coure, will make the connection between "bad IP" and
"your domain is at that IP", so it will be impossible for anyone to
decide that the IP's bad reputation will affect your domain's
reputation.
Where SPF ties reputations to domains, CSV ties it to IP's. Since
domains are hosted at IP's, it's not a terribly large leap of faith to
use CSV to tie reputation to domains, too. And CSV can't prevent this
leap, so we can guarantee that people will be using CSV to affect
domain reputation.
At that point, much of your argument against SPF applies to CSV.
Alan DeKok.