Re: expedience, consensus and editing

At 09:08 PM 11/26/97 +0000, Adam Back wrote:

My suggestions are:

1) armor MAY
2) MIME SHOULD (with update to rfc2015 where missing parts)



Ok.  So you implement armor and I implement MIME.  How do we interoperate?

d/
--------------------
Dave Crocker                                          
dcrocker(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Internet Mail Consortium                               +1 408 246 8253
675 Spruce Dr.                                    fax: +1 408 249 6205
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA              info(_at_)imc(_dot_)org , 
http://www.imc.org

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
The armour issue, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security Re: The armour issue, Gavan Schneider Re: The armour issue, Jon Callas Re: The armour issue, Dave Crocker / IMC expedience, consensus and editing, Adam Back Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Dave Crocker / IMC <= Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Adam Back Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Ian Grigg Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Ian Grigg Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Lutz Donnerhacke Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Bill Stewart Re: The armour issue, Ian Brown Re: The armour issue, Ian Grigg Re: The armour issue, Bill Stewart Re: The armour issue, Ian Grigg Re: The armour issue, Ian Brown

Previous by Date:	expedience, consensus and editing, Adam Back
Next by Date:	Re: The armour issue, Ian Brown
Previous by Thread:	expedience, consensus and editing, Adam Back
Next by Thread:	Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Adam Back
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]