Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists

I noticed as a result of Lutz quoting a section from his OpenPGP
formal spec to cypherpunks that it still refers to ROT-13 (he refers
to ROT-N).

I that the inclusion of ROT-N was a joke on the part of Jon Callas,
and that it had been removed from the draft.

I would suggest in the interests of security that it be removed from
the formal spec also.

(Hal suggested this comment be reposted here, as the discussion was in
cypherpunks, and some may not read cypherpunks).

Adam